Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2001-05-01 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2001-05-01 House Journal Page 1444 HJR 23 The following was read the second time: HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 23 Advocating the retention of the electoral college system in its present form. with the: Journal Page STA RPT CS(STA) 6DP 1DNP 1189 FN1: ZERO(H.STA) 1189 Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original resolution: CS FOR HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 23(STA) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Berkowitz: Page 2, line 4, following "advocates" through line 6: Delete all material. Insert "that the electoral college system be continued." Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Coghill objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2001-05-01 House Journal Page 1445 CSHJR 23(STA) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Hayes, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Moses Nays: Bunde, Chenault, Coghill, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Guess, Halcro, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Excused: Masek, Ogan Absent: Harris, Kookesh And so, Amendment No.1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 1, lines 11 - 12: Delete all material. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative James objected. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 2. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHJR 23(STA) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHJR 23(STA) was read the third time. 2001-05-01 House Journal Page 1446 The question being: "Shall CSHJR 23(STA) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHJR 23(STA) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 30 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Bunde, Chenault, Coghill, Crawford, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Guess, Halcro, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kott, Lancaster, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Nays: Cissna, Croft, Davies, Hayes, Kerttula, Kohring Excused: Masek, Ogan Absent: Harris, Kookesh And so, CSHJR 23(STA) passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.